Mike Puckett

  • Mike

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

CSWP

Subscribe

Email Newsletter:

  • Enter your email address:

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2006

« Solidworks World 2008 Top 10 Enhancement Requests | Main | Solidworks World 2009 Dates Announced »

January 23, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c8df69e200e54fef654f8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Solidworks 2009 Sneak Peak:

Comments

Paul Lemke

I love 2009. So I don't understand people's crashing stories. I had absolutely no problems on install and have been able to get tons more work done thanks to some of the stuff I use everyday. There are some glitches but when you do as much work as they have done and it is a ton, you are bound to have a few problems.

I have 4 lessons for those that complain:

1)Perfect doen't exist anywhere that is why we have tolerances and service packs.

2)If you want something that is super polished always wait till at least sp2 if not sp3. It is YOUR choice.

3) Hardware is the most important thing you spend measly money on. It pays for itself in lack of headaches. BUY GOOD HARDWARE do the RESEARCH(533 ram is outdated bigtime.)

4)If you think that 2008 or 2009 was bad your not using the S key and you have lost the number 1 improvement which is interface changes.

Prasad

Its not so useful in each enhancement they added.
its good it bits n piceses..
anyways 70 out of 100 for some really good features like negative dims, large asy mode, and plastic part design tools..
Best luck SW.. try to be more engineered software... be true to your words.. "focus on design not CAD"

Frank S

I have been usind SWx since 2000 , one of the features I still miss is the simple defer to mate in the assmebly mode without having to jump through a lot of hoops. I ran the 2004 version for way too long I guess but I didn't find much in the other versions that I truley liked.
most were just bigger with more memory and Vga requirements not better (at least for the things I design)
I have been running 2008 for about 8 months now and every day I cuss myself for not tossing it in the trash and staying with 2004.
08 doesn't take advantage of my CPU capabilities like it could
Cmos is a flaming joke for complex parts or structural assemblies never thought I would ever find it faster to use a pencil and paper for calculations than with a computer but SWX proves you can.
and Like others I have been waiting for the save back feature since 2001.
will 09 be any better from the reports I am hearing it is just another bigger is better lets see if we can use up more ram and graphics. program.
Just because I have a big machine doesn't mean I want it used up by the base program, I have duel moniters a 22" and 48" view screen and I like to have 20 to 40 open parts and sometimes that many assemblies if my CPU has to use every thing just to run the core program what good is that. Sounds like MICROSHAFT to me

B Riley

SolidWorks 2009 on XP 64bit cann't rebuild one of our benchmark files. All SolidWorks can come up with is our 4 GB of RAM isn't enough. By the way our VAR cann't get the file to rebuild either. 2005-2008 can, but 2009 needs more memory to rebuild the model.

Will

Hey! SW 2009 has bugs too!
Lets see...

crashes on first startup, every time, every machine

forgets references that haven't changed

corrupts files on save

sketches where it wants and not where you do

dont even think about touching spline handles once they get too short...

rebuilt features fail after restart

impossible to make a line tangent to a face

impossible to make a spline tangent to a face

overdefines sketches with only one relation

won't let you edit direction of a spline handle tangent to another unconstrained handle

creates invalid geometry

no mutliprocessor support

erases existing referenced entities when the missing one is re-selected

showing a body to select it deletes existing feature references

flip side to cut reverses after restart

merge tangent faces toggles with restart

shall I go on?

SolidWorks is a piece of ****, but it's still the shiniest one!

Oh yeah...All the above bugs can be fixed if you remove your antivirus! (at least that's what your VAR will tell you when you call them wondering why they sent you a polished turd in a box instead of some excellent CAD software)

Solidworks 2009 is the number one reason to use a CAD package besides Solidworks. I will be migrating my entire CAD department to another package as soon as my WORTHLESS support subscription expires. Good work, SW!


Andrew

Funny, the gripes look like they were ctrl+c: ctrl+v'ed from the Autodcad Forums. Anybody know why both Co's had such heavy "08 issues?

Diego

Nossa dimais os desenhos são perfeitos.
Muito bom!

John E

I am still waiting for the day the program becomes backwards compatible.

Justin

Interesting changes and enhancements, and getting some speed back is good. But does it make proper use of my muti-cpu workstation, and all my memory? I really wish they would sort out the release they are on - SW2008 is one of the worst yet, just full of problems. Personally I would prefer to see a major release every (say) three years, and the software we have work properly or be fixed until it does. It seems to me the moment they release the software it is dumped on the support people whilst the designers and developers rush to start the next years offering....

A User

Well, this looks interesting, Solid Works now does most of the things that Solid Edge did years ago. Looks like they have a lot of catching up to do before Solid Works can match Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.